Vol. 106 No. 2 (2012)
Research Papers

Effects of deficit drip-irrigation scheduling regimes with saline water on pepper yield, water productivity and soil salinity under arid conditions of Tunisia

Kamel Nagaz
Institut des Régions Arides Médenine
Mohamed Moncef Masmoudi
INAT, 43 avenue Charles Nicolle, 2083 Tunis,
Netij Ben Mechlia
INAT, 43 avenue Charles Nicolle, 2083 Tunis,
Published December 20, 2012
How to Cite
Nagaz, K., Masmoudi, M. M., & Ben Mechlia, N. (2012). Effects of deficit drip-irrigation scheduling regimes with saline water on pepper yield, water productivity and soil salinity under arid conditions of Tunisia. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 106(2), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.20122.60


A two-year study was carried out in order to assess the effects of different irrigation scheduling regimes with saline water on soil salinity, yield and water productivity of pepper under actual commercial-farming conditions in the arid region of Tunisia. Pepper was grown on a sandy soil and drip-irrigated with water having an ECi of 3.6 dS/m. Irrigation treatments consisted in water replacements of accumulated ETc at levels of 100% (FI, full irrigation), 80% (DI-80), 60% (DI-60), when the readily available water in the control treatment (FI) is depleted, deficit irrigation during ripening stage (FI-MDI60) and farmer method corresponding to irrigation practices implemented by the local farmers (FM). Results on pepper yield and soil salinity are globally consistent between the two-year experiments and shows significant difference between irrigation regimes. Higher soil salinity was maintained over the two seasons, 2008 and 2009, with DI-60 and FM treatments than FI. FI-MDI60 and DI-80 treatments resulted also in low ECe values. Highest yields for both years were obtained under FI (22.3 and 24.4 t/ha) although we didn’t find significant differences with the regulated deficit irrigation treatment (FI-DI60). However, the DI-80 and DI-60 treatments caused significant reductions in pepper yields through a reduction in fruits number/m² and average fruit weight in comparison with FI treatment. The FM increased soil salinity and caused significant reductions in yield with 14 to 43%, 12 to 39% more irrigation water use than FI, FI-MDI60 and DI-80 treatments, respectively, in 2008 and 2009. Yields for all irrigation treatments were higher in the second year compared to the first year. Water productivity (WP) values reflected this difference and varied between 2.31 and 5.49 kg/m3. The WP was found to vary significantly among treatments, where the highest and the lowest values were observed for DI-60 treatment and FM, respectively. FI treatment provides significant advantage on yield and water productivity, compared to FM in pepper production under experimental conditions. For water-saving purposes, the FI irrigation scheduling is recommended for drip irrigated pepper grown under field conditions and can be used by farmers to optimize the use of saline water and to control soil salinity. In case of limited water supply, adopting deficit irrigation strategies (FI-DI60 and DI-80) could be an alternative for irrigation scheduling of pepper crop under the arid Mediterranean conditions of Tunisia.

Key words: salinity, drip irrigation scheduling, deficit irrigation, pepper yield, water productivity