Vol. 119 No. 1 (2025)
Research Papers

Innovative improvements of silvopastoral systems applied to the Brachiaria decumbens yields in degraded areas – A case study in Orellana, Amazonian Ecuador

PDF
  • Armando Vinicio Paredes-Peralta,
  • Santiago Alexander Guamán Rivera,
  • Sandra Elizabeth Suárez Cedillo,
  • Sandra Isabel Castañeda Caguana,
  • Dina Maricela Veloz-Veloz,
  • María Fernanda Baquero-Tapia,
  • Myriam Valeria Ruiz Salgado,
  • Diego Fabian Maldonado Arias
Armando Vinicio Paredes-Peralta
Universidad Estatal Amazónica, el Puyo, Ecuador
Santiago Alexander Guamán Rivera
Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Grupo de Investigación en Rumiantes (G2R), Bellaterra, Spain
Sandra Elizabeth Suárez Cedillo
Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), sede Orellana, El Coca, Ecuador
Sandra Isabel Castañeda Caguana
Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), sede Orellana, El Coca, Ecuador
Dina Maricela Veloz-Veloz
Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Recursos Naturales (CAREN). Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga, Ecuador
María Fernanda Baquero-Tapia
Independent Researcher, Riobamba, Ecuador
Myriam Valeria Ruiz Salgado
Independent Researcher, Riobamba, Ecuador
Diego Fabian Maldonado Arias
Independent Researcher, Riobamba, Ecuador
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jaeid-16729

Published 2025-07-08

Keywords

  • Silvopastoral systems,
  • livestock precision,
  • Equator amazon,
  • small livestock

How to Cite

Paredes-Peralta, A. V., Guamán Rivera, S. A., Suárez Cedillo, S. E., Castañeda Caguana, S. I., Veloz-Veloz, D. M., Baquero-Tapia, M. F., Ruiz Salgado, M. V., & Maldonado Arias, D. F. (2025). Innovative improvements of silvopastoral systems applied to the Brachiaria decumbens yields in degraded areas – A case study in Orellana, Amazonian Ecuador. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 119(1), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.36253/jaeid-16729

Copyright (c) 2025 Armando Vinicio Paredes-Peralta, Santiago Alexander Guamán Rivera, Sandra Elizabeth Suárez Cedillo, Sandra Isabel Castañeda Caguana, Dina Maricela Veloz-Veloz, María Fernanda Baquero-Tapia, Myriam Valeria Ruiz Salgado, Diego Fabian Maldonado Arias

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Climate change is a global, recurring phenomenon that is altering weather patterns around the world. The corresponding changes have significant implications for natural ecosystems, agriculture, and livestock. Based on this context, we realized a study, which assessed the effect of silvopastoral systems on Brachiaria decumbens yields. Therefore, we realized a completely randomized block design with three replications for each treatment. The treatments were of low density of trees/ha (138 ha-1) named SPs1, a high density of trees/ha (312 ha-1) named SPs2, as well as a monoculture system (no trees) only pasture named simply Control. The experimental variables evaluated were forage production, chemical composition and nutrient values. The results yielded variations in the agronomic data by treatment (P < 0.05) and season effects (P = < 0.05). Despite that, all chemical determinations did not change among treatments (P = 0.11 to 0.96) nor for the season effect (P = 0.43 to 0.98). Subsequently, all nutritional values (i.e., energy and protein values) lacked to vary by main effects (P = 0.26 to 0.92). In conclusion, the SPs improved the agronomic responses, which may allow a greater chemical composition and forage quality in the long term. Nevertheless, further long-term studies should be performed in order to confirm and improve the given results of the current study.

PDF

References

  1. Van Amburgh, M., Thomas., R. Overton, L., Chase, D.A., Ross., & Recktenwald, E.B. (2009). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: Current and Future Approaches for Balancing of Amino Acids. Pp. 28–37 in Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers. Ithaca, NY 14853.
  2. AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis,17th Edition, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  3. Baldassini, P., Despósito, Cristian., Piñeiro, G & Paruelo, J.M. (2018). Silvopastoral Systems of the Chaco Forests: Effects of Trees on Grass Growth. Journal of Arid Environments. 87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.05.008.
  4. Costa, S., de Mello, A.C., Dubeux, J.C., M.V., dos Santos, M.A. Lira, Oliveira, J.T., & Apolinário, V. (2016). Livestock Performance in Warm-Climate Silvopastures Using Tree Legumes. Agronomy Journal 108:2026-2035. doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.03.0180.
  5. Evitayani, L., Warly, A., Fariani, T., Ichinohe, T., & Fujihara, T. (2004). Potential Nutritive Value of Selected Forages in Indonesia. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciencesi. 17(11):1518–23.
  6. Fahey Jr, G.C., Collins, M., Mertens, D.R., & Moser, L.E. (1994). Forage Quality , Evaluation , and Utilization. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Unites States.
  7. Fuentes-Quisaguano, O.G,. Guamán-Rivera, S.A. Erazo-Rodriguez, F., Guacapiña, A., & Aragón-Vásquez, E., 2023. Erythrina Edulis as A Potential Fodder Alternative For Improving Livestock Nutrition by Small Livestock Farmers. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine 14:24‑28.
  8. Fuentes, O.G., Guamán-Rivera, S.A., Zacarías, F., and Paredes, V. (2023). Silvopastoral Systems as a Strategy for Reconversion of Livestock Farming in Ecuadorian Amazon. Advanced Composites Bulletin 1:135-138.
  9. GADMO. 2019. Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial Municipal de Francisco de Orellana. https://orellana.gob.ec/.Last. Last accessed on July 15th 2024.
  10. Garay, J., Cancino, S., Fortuna, P., Hinojosa, M.A., González, J.C., González, D.R., & Cienfuegos-Rivas, E.G. (2017). Dry Matter Accumulation and Crude Protein Concentration in Brachiaria Spp. Cultivars in the Humid Tropics of Ecuador. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 5(2):66–76. doi: 10.17138/TGFT(5)66-76.
  11. Garcez, B.S., Alves, A.A., & Macedo, E.DeO. (2020). Ruminal Degradation of Panicum Grasses in Three Post-Regrowth Ages. Ciência Animal Brasileira 21,e – 55699. doi: 10.1590/1809-6891v21e-55699.
  12. Givens, D.I., Owen, E., Axford, R.F.E., & Omed, H.M. (2000). Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK).
  13. Gomes, F., Pedreira, C.G., Bosi, C., Cavalli, J., Holschuch, S.G.G., Mourão, G., Pereira, D., & Pedreira, B. (2019). Shading Effects on Marandu Palisadegrass in a Silvopastoral System: Plant Morphological and Physiological Responses. Agronomy Journal 111:2332-2340. doi: 10.2134/agronj2019.01.0052.
  14. Gómez, S., Guenni, O., & Bravo de Guenni, L. (2013). Growth, Leaf Photosynthesis and Canopy Light Use Efficiency under Differing Irradiance and Soil N Supplies in the Forage Grass Brachiaria Decumbens Stapf. Grass and Forage Science 68,395-407. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12002.
  15. González-Marcillo, R.L,. Castro Guamàn, W.E., Guerrero Pincay, A.E., Vera Zambrano, P.A., Ortiz Naveda, N.R., & Guamàn Rivera, S.A. (2021). Assessment of Guinea Grass Panicum Maximum under Silvopastoral Systems in Combination with Two Management Systems in Orellana Province, Ecuador. Agriculture 11(2):117. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11020117.
  16. Guamán-Rivera, S.A,, Albanell, E., Ajenjo, O., Casals, R., Abdelaali, E., Salama, A.A., & Caja, G. (2023). Performances and Nutritional Values of a New Hooded Barley (Cv . Mochona) and a High Yield Triticale (Cv . Titania ) as Hay or Silage for Sheep under Mediterranean Conditions.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 305:115784. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115784.
  17. Guamán-Rivera, S.A., Guerrero-Pincay, A.E., Ortiz-Naveda, N., & González-Marcillo, R. (2023). Prediction of the Nutritional Values by INRA (2018) Feed Evaluation System of Megathyrsus Maximus Subjected to Different Grazing Strategies. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development. 17:117-139. doi: 10.36253/jaeid-14203.
  18. Guamán-Rivera, S.A., Sánchez-quispe, H.R., Pomavilla-guaminga, S., Toalombo-Vargas, P. Flores-Guerra, C. O., Guacapiña-viteri, A., Carrillo-Guilcapi, C.D,, & Salgado-Ruiz, V. (2024). Evaluation of Brachiaria decumbens Production by Humus Plus Mycograss Biofertilisers Effect. SDGsReview 4:1–17.
  19. Guamán-Rivera, S.A., Herrera-Feijoo, R., Velepucha-Caiminagua, H.J.V., Avalos-Peñafiel, G., Aguilar-Miranda, E., Melendres-Medina, M., Baquero-Tapia, M.F., Cajamarca Carrazco, D., Fernández-Vinueza, A., Montero-Arteaga, A., & Zambrano-Cedeño. J. (2024). Silvopastoral Systems as a Tool for Recovering Degraded Pastures and Improving Animal Thermal Comfort Indexes in Northern Ecuador. Brazilian Journal of Biology 84:e286137. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.286137.
  20. Hancock, D. (2017). Common Terms Used in Animal Feeding and Nutrition. UGA extens.Cooperative Extension Bulletin 1367.
  21. Hare, M.D., Supaphan Phengphet, T.S., & Sutin. Naddakorn. (2014). Botanical and Agronomic Growth of Two Panicum Maximum Cultivars, Mombasa and Tanzania , at Varying Sowing Rates. Tropical Grasslands – Forrajes Tropicales 2,246-254.
  22. Holdridge, L.R. (1967). Life Zone Ecology. San Jose, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center.
  23. INAMHI. (2021). “Direccion Gestion Meteorologica Estudios e Investigaciones Meteorologicas, Ecuador. Last accessed on 18th January 2023 www.Serviciometerologico.Gob.Ec.” 1–12.
  24. INEC. (2022). Proyecciones Poblacionales.Https://Www.Ecuadorencifras.Gob.Ec/Proyecciones-Poblacionales/. Last accessed May 1st, 2022.
  25. INRA. (2018). Alimentation Des Ruminants, Éditions Quæ, Versailles, France, 728 P.
  26. Inzunza, Juan. (2007). “Earth’s Climates.” P. 31 in Descriptive Meteorology.
  27. Jayasinghe, P., Thiagarajah-Ramilan, D.J., Donaghy, K. Pembleton, G., & Barber, D.G. (2022). Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production : A Meta-Analysis. Animals 12,1806.
  28. Larcher, W. (2003). Physiological Plant Ecology: Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups. Fourth Edition. Springer. Germany.
  29. Lima, M., Paciullo, D.S., Morenz, M.J., Gomide, C.A., Rodrigues, R.A.R., & Chizzotti. F.H. (2019). Productivity and Nutritive Value of Brachiaria Decumbens and Performance of Dairy Heifers in a Long-Term Silvopastoral System. Grass and Forage Science 74(1):160–70. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12395.
  30. Lima, M.A., Domingos, S.C., Paciullo, F., Silva, F., Mirton J.F., Morenz, C.A.M., Gomide, R.A.R., Rodrigues, I., Bretas, L., & Chizzotti, F.H.M. (2019). Evaluation of a Long-Established Silvopastoral Brachiaria decumbens System: Plant Characteristics and Feeding Value for Cattle.” Crop and Pasture Science 70(9):814–25. doi: 10.1071/CP19027.
  31. de Lima Veras, E.L., Difante, G.S., Chaves-Gurgel, A.L., Graciano da Costa, A.B., Gomes-Rodrigues, J.C., Marques Costa, J.V., Neto, E., Pereira, M.G., & Costa, P.R. (2020). Tillering and Structural Characteristics of Panicum Cultivars in the Brazilian Semiarid Region. Sustainability 12,3849. doi: 10.3390/su12093849.
  32. McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. C., Morgan, A., Sinclair, L.A., & Wilkinson. R.G. (2010). The Animal and Its Food. Seventh Edition. London, UK.
  33. Melo, H., & Soares de Olivera. A. (2022). A New Protein Requirement System for Dairy Cows. Journal Dairy Science. 10622348. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22348.
  34. Mena, C., Hill, C., Carolina, N., Bilsborrow, R., & Mcclain, M. (2006). Socioeconomic Drivers of Deforestation in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon. Environmental Management 37:802-815. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0230-z.
  35. Mlay, P.S., Pereka, A., Phiri, E.C., Balthazary, S., Igusti, Jelantik., Hvelplund, T., Riis Weisbjerg, M., Madsen, Jørgen. (2006). Feed Value of Selected Tropical Grasses, Legumes and Concentrates. Veterinarski Arhives.76(1):53–63.
  36. Do Nascimento, H.L.B., Pedreira, B.C., Sollenberger, L.E., Pereira, D.H., Magalhães, C.A.D.S., & Chizzotti, F.H.M. (2019). Physiological Characteristics and Forage Accumulation of Grazed Marandu Palisade Grass (Brachiaria brizantha) Growing in Monoculture and in Silvopasture with Eucalyptus Urograndis. Crop and Pasture Science.70,384-394. doi: 10.1071/CP18403.
  37. NRC. (1962). National Research Council. Basic Problems and Techniques in Range Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  38. Ogoukayode, E., Olomonchİ, Akambi., Vaiz Garİpoğlu, Ali., Ocak, Nuh., & Kamalak, A. (2021). Nutritional Values and in Vitro Fermentation Parameters of Some Fodder Species Found in Two Rangeland Areas in the Republic of Benin. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 45:1-8. doi: 10.3906/vet-2101-69.
  39. Olival, A.A., Franco de Souza, S.E.X., Gomes de Moraes, J.P., & Campana, M. (2021). Effect of Amazonian Tree Species on Soil and Pasture Quality in Silvopastoral Systems. Acta Amazonica 51:281-290. doi: 10.1590/1809-4392202004692.
  40. Olivera-Viciedo, D., Prado, R.M., Martinez, C.A., Habermann, E., Ferraz-Branco, R.B., Piccolo, M.C., Calero-Hurtado, A., Peña-Calzada, K., & Lata-Tenesaca, L.F. (2021). Water Stress and Warming Impact Nutrient Use Efficiency of Mombasa Grass (Megathyrsus Maximus) in Tropical Conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 207,128-138. doi: 10.1111/jac.12452.
  41. Olivera, Y., Machado, R., & Del pozo, P. (2006). Botanical and Agronomic Characteristics of Important Forage Species of the Brachiaria Genus. Pastos y Forrajes 29, 1–23.
  42. Olivera, Y., Machado, R., & Pozo. P.P. (2006). Botanical and Agronomic Characteristics of Important Forage Species of the Brachiaria Genus. Pastos y Forrajes 29(1):15.
  43. Ortega-Aguirre, C., Lemus-Flores, C., Bugarín-Prado, J., Gelacio, A.S., Ramos-Quirarte, A., Grageola-Núñez, O., & Bonilla-Cárdenas, J. 2015. Agronomic Characteristics, Bromatological Composition, Digestibility and Consumption Animal in Four Species of Grasses of the Genera Brachiaria and Panicum. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 18:291-301.
  44. Paciullo, D., Campos, S., Ribeiro-Campos, N., Miranda-Gomide, C.A., Tavares De Castro, C.R., Tavela, R.C., & Pereyra-Rossiello, R.O. (2008). Growth of Signalgrass Influenced by Shading Levels and Season of the Year. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 43(7):917–23. doi: 10.1590/s0100-204x2008000700017.
  45. Pezzopane, J., Macedo-Nicodemo, M.L., Bosi, C., Garcia, A., & Lulu, J. (2019) Animal Thermal Comfort Indexes in Silvopastoral Systems with Different Tree Arrangements. Journal of Thermal Biology 79:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.12.015.
  46. Ríos, S., Benítez, D., & Soria, S. (2016). Territorial Food Chains. Tensions and Learning from the Dairy Sector in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Economics Readings (84). doi: 10.17533/udea.le.n84a06.
  47. Rojas-Downing, M.M., Nejadhashemi, A.P., Harrigan, T., & Woznicki. S.A. (2017). Climate Risk Management Climate Change and Livestock: Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation. Climate Risk Management 16:145-163. doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001.
  48. Sarma, V., Paul, S., & W., Guanghua. (2002). Structural Transformation, Growth, and Inequality: Evidence from Viet Nam. ADBI Working Paper 681. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: Https://Www.Adb.Org/Publications/Structural-Transformation-Growth-and- Inequality-Evidence-Viet-Nam.” (681).
  49. Sauvant, D., & Nozière. P. (2016). Quantification of the Main Digestive Processes in Ruminants: The Equations Involved in the Renewed Energy and Protein Feed Evaluation Systems. Animal 10:755-770. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002670.
  50. Silva-olaya, A.M., Olaya-montes, A., Polan, K.L., Duran-bautista, E.H., & Ortiz-morea, F.A. (2022). Silvopastoral Systems Enhance Soil Health in the Amazon Region. Sustainability 14(1), 320.
  51. Torres, B., Andrade, V., Heredia-R, M., Toulkeridis, T., Estupiñán, K., Luna, M., & García, A. (2022). Productive Livestock Characterization and Recommendations for Good Practices Focused on the Achievement of the SDGs in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Sustainability, 14(17), 10738.
  52. Toulkeridis, T., Tamayo, E., Simón-Baile, D., Merizalde-Mora, M.J., Reyes–Yunga, D. F., Viera-Torres, M., & Heredia, M. (2020). Climate Change according to Ecuadorian academics–Perceptions versus facts. LA GRANJA. Revista de Ciencias de la Vida, 31(1), 21-46.
  53. Toulkeridis, T., & Zach, I. (2017). Wind directions of volcanic ash-charged clouds in Ecuador–implications for the public and flight safety. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2), 242-256.
  54. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., and Lewis, B.A. (1991). Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74, 3583–97. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
  55. Low, S.G. (2015). Signal Grass (Brachiaria decumbens) Toxicity in Grazing Ruminants. Agriculture 5(4), 971-990. doi: 10.3390/agriculture5040971.
  56. Szymczak, L.S., Moraes, A.D., Fonseca, L., Paulo, C., Faccio, D., & Alda. L. (2021). Low-Intensity, High-Frequency Grazing Strategy Increases Herbage Production and Beef Cattle Performance on Sorghum Pastures. Animals 12,13.https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ani12010013
  57. UNDP. (2017). Sustainable Development of the Ecuadorian Amazon: Integrated Management of Multiple Use Landscapes and High Value Conservation Forests. GEF/UNDP Project 12–26.
  58. Waller, S.S., & Lewis, J. K. (1979). Occurrence of C3 and C4 photosynthetic pathways in North American grasses. Rangeland Ecology & Management/Journal of Range Management Archives, 32(1), 12-28.

Most read articles by the same author(s)