Vol. 120 No. 1 (2026)
Research Papers

Natural, Structural or Man-made Impediments: What Triggers Vulnerability in a Disaster-Prone Rural Pakistan?

Manzoor Hussain Memon
School of Social Sciences, SZABIST University, Karachi, Pakistan

Published 2026-06-29

Keywords

  • Natural Disasters,
  • Man-made Hazards,
  • Sustainability,
  • Capacity and Vulnerability Index,
  • Rural,
  • Pakistan
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Memon, M. H. (2026). Natural, Structural or Man-made Impediments: What Triggers Vulnerability in a Disaster-Prone Rural Pakistan?. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 120(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.36253/jaeid-17140

Abstract

Natural catastrophic events are beyond human control; however, human interventions exacerbating natural disasters can be managed through appropriate policy measures. This study evaluates disaster vulnerability in the rural areas of district Badin, Sindh province, Pakistan, using a primary survey data collected through a multistage sampling design (301 households in 15 communities). The main objective is to identify the key natural, structural, and man-made impediments contributing to vulnerability. The research computes a household-level Vulnerability and Capacity Index (VCI) and use descriptive statistics and group comparisons to assess differences between Left Bank Outfall Drain (LBOD) and non-LBOD communities. Findings highlight that areas with significant human influence such as communities near the LBOD, are highly vulnerable. Environmental changes, including sea intrusion from the Arabian Sea intensified by upstream water mismanagement, have severely affected traditional livelihoods, groundwater quality, and arable land. These impacts extend to non-LBOD communities, further aggravating vulnerability. The study underscores the urgent need to rehabilitate and maintain critical man-made structures, ensure proper water management, and enhance local socio-economic conditions to reduce household-level vulnerability. Strengthening community networks, institutional support, and access to essential services can play a key role in building resilience in similar rural settings.

References

  1. Anderson, M. B., & Woodrow, P. J. (1989). Rising from the ashes: Development strategies in times of disaster. Westview Press. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US9101558
  2. Baloch, S., Chang, F. K., Mangio, H.-R., Sana, M., & Kumbhar, M. I. (2019). Deterioration of Ground Water Quality through Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Area of District Badin Sindh Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 20(5), 148–157.
  3. Barrios, E. B. (2008). Infrastructure and rural development: Household perceptions on rural development. Progress in Planning, 70(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.04.001
  4. DDMA. (2008). Disaster Risk Management Plan: District Badin (District Disaster Risk Management Plan, p. 100). District Disaster Management Authority, Government of Sindh. http://www.ndma.gov.pk/plans/Disaster%20Risk%20Management%20Plan%20Badin.pdf
  5. El-Sabh, M. I., & Murty, T. S. (Eds.). (1988). Natural and Man-Made Hazards. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1433-9
  6. EM-DAT. (2020, April 15). EM-DAT | The International Disasters Database. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. https://www.emdat.be/
  7. Franke, T., Ho, T., & Christie, C. (2012). The Chi-Square Test Often Used and More Often Misinterpreted. American Journal of Evaluation, 33, 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011426594
  8. Frazier, L., Yu, E., Sanner, J., Liu, F., Udtha, M., Cron, S., Coulter, S., & Bogaev, R. C. (2012, March 26). Gender Differences in Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [Research Article]. Nursing Research and Practice; Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/109251
  9. GoP. (2012). Annual Flood Report 2012 (p. 99) [Annual Flood Report]. Ministry of Water and Power, Government of Pakistan. http://mowr.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Annual-Flood-Report-2012.pdf
  10. GoP. (2017). Census Report 2017 [Census]. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan.
  11. GoS. (2015). Development Statistics of Sindh 2014 (No. 44th; Development Statistics of Sindh, p. 327). Bureau of Statistics, Government of Sindh. http://sindhbos.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/DS-2014.pdf
  12. GoS. (2019). Development Statistics of Sindh 2018 (No. 48th; Development Statistics of Sindh, p. 345). Bureau of Statistics, Government of Sindh. http://sindhbos.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Development-Statistics-of-Sindh-2018.pdf
  13. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2012). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  14. Iqbal, M. A., Jamal, H., & Memon, M. H. (2017). Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment with regard to Social Protection: A Study of districts Lower Dir, Nowshera, Rahim Yar Khan and Sargodha (p. 68) [Case Study]. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH and Social Policy and Development Centre, Karachi. https://socialprotection.org/discover/publications/vulnerability-and-capacity-assessment-regard-social-protection
  15. Jamal, H. (2007). Income Poverty at District Level: An Application of Small Area Estimation Technique (Research Report No. 70; p. 21). Social Policy and Development Centre.
  16. Jamal, H., & Lohano, H. R. (2008). Understanding Rural Poverty Dynamics: The Case of The Poorest District of Sindh Pakistan (Research Report No. 78; p. 29). Social Policy and Development Centre.
  17. Kanwal, S., Ding, X., Sajjad, M., & Abbas, S. (2019). Three Decades of Coastal Changes in Sindh, Pakistan (1989-2018): A Geospatial Assessment. Remote Sensing, 12, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010008
  18. Kim, T. K. (2017). Understanding one-way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.1.22
  19. Mahessar, A., Mukwana, K., Qureshi, A., Ehsan, M., Leghari, H., & Manganhar, A. (2016). ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY OF LBOD SYSTEM AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS. QUAID-E-AWAM UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 15, 32–39.
  20. Mansuri, G., Sami, M. F., Ali, M., Doan, H. T. T., Javed, B., & Pandey, P. (2018). When Water Becomes a Hazard: A Diagnostic Report on The State of Water Supply, Sanitation and Poverty in Pakistan and Its Impact on Child Stunting (No. 131860; pp. 1–151). The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/649341541535842288/When-Water-Becomes-a-Hazard-A-Diagnostic-Report-on-The-State-of-Water-Supply-Sanitation-and-Poverty-in-Pakistan-and-Its-Impact-on-Child-Stunting
  21. Memon, M. H. (2023). Poverty, Gap and Severity Estimates for Disaster Prone Rural Areas of Pakistan. Social Indicators Research, 166(3), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03082-0
  22. Memon, M. H., Aamir, N., & Ahmed, N. (2018). Climate Change and Drought: Impact of Food Insecurity on Gender Based Vulnerability in District Tharparkar. The Pakistan Development Review, 57(3), 307–321.
  23. Memon, M. H., & Ahmed, R. (2022). Multi-topographical landscape: Comparative vulnerability of climate-induced disaster-prone rural area of Pakistan. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05107-8
  24. Memon, M. H., Ali, M., & Khalil, S. (2020). Determinants of income diversification in flood-prone rural Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101914
  25. MFF Pakistan. (2016). A Handbook on Pakistan’s Coastal and Marine Resources (Mangroves for the Future, Pakistan, p. 78). Mangroves for the Future, Pakistan. https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/pk_coastal_resources_handbook.pdf
  26. Modica, M., Reggiani, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2018). Vulnerability, resilience and exposure: Methodological aspects and an empirical applications to shocks. In SEEDS Working Papers (No. 1318; SEEDS Working Papers). SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies. https://ideas.repec.org/p/srt/wpaper/1318.html
  27. Mustafa, D. (2003). Reinforcing vulnerability? Disaster relief, recovery, and response to the 2001 flood in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 5(3–4), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.05.001
  28. Mustafa, D., Ahmed, S., Saroch, E., & Bell, H. (2011). Pinning down vulnerability: From narratives to numbers. Disasters, 35(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01193.x
  29. Mustafa, D., Gioli, G., Memon, M., Noshirwani, M., Idris, I., & Ahmed, N. (2019). Pinning down social vulnerability in Sindh Province, Pakistan: From narratives to numbers, and back again. Disasters, 43(2), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12315
  30. NCSW. (2012). Assessment of Disaster Management Institutions: An Investigated Study [An Investigated Study]. National Commission for Status of Women.
  31. Novelo-Casanova, D. A., & Suárez, G. (2010). Natural and man-made hazards in the Cayman Islands. Natural Hazards, 55(2), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9539-0
  32. Park, H. (2011). Man-made disasters: A cross-national analysis. International Business Review, 20(4), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.08.004
  33. Pasha, H. A. (2019). Growth and Inequality in Pakistan: Vol. I (First). Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/pakistan/15252-20190411.pdf
  34. PDMA. (2011). Disaster Need Assessment: Sindh 2011. Provincial Disaster Management Authority, Government of Sindh.
  35. PES. (2018). Pakistan Economic Survey 2017-18 (Annual Report Nos. 2017–18; Pakistan Economic Survey). Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan. http://finance.gov.pk/survey_1718.html
  36. PSLM. (2016). Pakistan Social and Living Measurement Survey 2014-15 (National / Provincial / District) (No. 10th; Pakistan Social and Living Measurement Survey, p. 489). Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan. http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/pakistan-social-and-living-standards-measurement-survey-pslm-2014-15-provincial-district
  37. R, B., N, M., M.i, A., G, R., A, H., T, S., A, H., M, T., & K, Y. (1999). Waterlogging and salinity management in the Sindh Province. Volume one - Supplement 1-D: Drainage in the LBOD project: impact assessment. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=QL19990086658
  38. Rana, R., & Singhal, R. (2015). Chi-square test and its application in hypothesis testing. 1(1), 69–71. https://doi.org/DOI:%252010.4103/2395-5414.157577
  39. Sawada, Y., Bhattacharyay, M., & Kotera, T. (2019). Aggregate Impacts of Natural and Man-made Disasters: A Quantitative Comparison. International Journal of Development and Conflict, 9(1), 43–73.
  40. SPDC. (2015). Gender and Social Vulnerability to Climate Change: A study of Disaster Prone Areas in Sindh (p. 144). Social Policy and Development Centre. https://spdc.org.pk/publications/gender-and-social-vulnerability-to-climate-change-a-study-of-disaster-prone-areas-in-sindh
  41. The Express Tribune. (2010, June 30). Four Sindh districts declared to be disaster-prone. The Express Tribune. https://tribune.com.pk/story/24664/four-sindh-districts-declared-to-be-disaster-prone/
  42. The News International. (2014, June 6). ‘The sea may swallow Thatta, Badin, Sujawal in 30 years.’ https://www.thenews.com.pk/archive/print/506793-‘the-sea-may-swallow-thatta-badin-sujawal-in-30-years’
  43. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the Qualitative–Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54.
  44. Warr, P., & Aung, L. L. (2019). Poverty and inequality impact of a natural disaster: Myanmar’s 2008 cyclone Nargis. World Development, 122(C), 446–461.
  45. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2003). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters (2nd edition). Routledge.