Vol. 119 No. 1 (2025)
Research Papers

Valuing the forest: willingness-to-pay for ecopark with notes on tree architecture in Ifugao, Philippines

PDF
  • Eric D. Bimmoy,
  • Daniel V. Bernardino,
  • Sheila T. Bimmoy
Eric D. Bimmoy
Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture and Sustainable Development, Ifugao State University, Potia Campus, Alfonso Lista, Ifugao, Philippines
Daniel V. Bernardino
Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture and Sustainable Development, Ifugao State University, Potia Campus, Alfonso Lista, Ifugao, Philippines
Sheila T. Bimmoy
Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture and Sustainable Development, Ifugao State University, Potia Campus, Alfonso Lista, Ifugao, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jaeid-16689

Published 2025-07-08

Keywords

  • Willingness-to-pay,
  • ecological,
  • indigenous,
  • trail,
  • sustainable

How to Cite

Bimmoy, E. D., Bernardino, D. V., & Bimmoy, S. T. (2025). Valuing the forest: willingness-to-pay for ecopark with notes on tree architecture in Ifugao, Philippines . Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 119(1), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.36253/jaeid-16689

Copyright (c) 2025 Eric D. Bimmoy, Daniel V. Bernardino, Sheila T. Bimmoy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The survey aimed to examine the factors influencing local tourists’ Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) for the ecopark, focusing on tree crown architecture and the georeferencing of indigenous trees. The study was conducted at the Ecotrail and Reservation Site of Indigenous Species (ECOTRIS) at Ifugao State University. The results revealed that ECOTRIS entails a significant consumption cost, as 90% of the tourists surveyed expressed a willingness to pay for its management. Among these, 72.2% were willing to pay ₱10, 18.5% ₱15, and 9.3% ₱20.The majority of respondents (69%) were aged 15–25 years, while 21% were 26–39 years old. The WTP results showed that ecological enhancements and approval of existing facilities were statistically significant factors. Regarding trail preferences, concreted trails were favored over unconcreted ones, with land use, situational features, and natural obstacles also influencing tourists’ willingness to pay and satisfaction with the facilities. The study found that ECOTRIS is predominantly visited by younger male tourists and university students, rather than older individuals, women, or high school students, with significant statistical differences observed among these groups. Additionally, the tree crown architecture of native trees was perceived to have higher aesthetic value compared to non-native or exotic species. Non-native species were noted to be potentially invasive, often outcompeting native trees for sunlight in forest stands.

 

PDF

References

  1. Acharya, R.P., Maraseni, T.N. & Cockfield, G., 2021. Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users. Annals of Forest Science, 78, 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-021-01046-3
  2. Akbarizadeh, N., Maleknia, R., Badehian, Z., Khosravi, S., 2021. Studying the effect of economic and social factors on the willing to participate in sustainable forest management using sustainability certification (case study furniture Market Yaftabad - Tehran). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 23(8), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.30495/jest.2022.19445.2826
  3. Akujärvi, A., Lehtonen, A., Liski, J., 2016. Ecosystem services of boreal forests – carbon budget mapping at high resolution. Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 498–514.
  4. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E.E., Rander, R., Schuman, H., 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58(10), 4601–4614.
  5. Askar, H., Tahang, H., Sutinah, S., Fakhriyyah, S., Bahar, A., Tresnati, J., Tuwo, A., 2021. Short Communication: Using ecological parameters to assess the sustainability of mangrove ecotourism in Jeneponto, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 22(8).
  6. Asmare, E., Bekele, K., Fentaw, S., 2022. Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia. Heliyon, 8(1), e08813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08813
  7. Bal, Debi Prasad, Mohanty, Seba, 2014. Determinants of willingness to pay for entrance fee to national park: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 35(4), 65–73.
  8. Carson, R., 2012. Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.
  9. Chávez, J.M., Tetto, A.F., Reynel, C.A., Sousa, N.J., 2022. Evaluation of tourism management in the Bosque de Pomac Historical Sanctuary, Peru. Floresta, 52(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.5380/RF.V52I1.74039
  10. Chen, Y., Young, D., de Koff, J., Britwum, K., 2023. Extension agents’ perceptions, practices, and needs of urban forestry: a case study from Tennessee, United States. Sustainability, 15(21), 15328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115328
  11. Cheung, M.L., Pires, G.D., Rosenberger, P.J., 2020. The influence of perceived social media marketing elements on consumer–brand engagement and brand knowledge. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.
  12. Chomicki, G., Coiro, M., Renner, S.S., 2017. Evolution and ecology of plant architecture: integrating insights from the fossil record, extant morphology, developmental genetics and phylogenies. Annals of Botany, 120(6), 855–891.
  13. Davies, H.J., Wu, H., Schaafsma, M., 2023. Willingness-to-pay for urban ecosystem services provision under objective and subjective uncertainty. Resources and Energy Economics, 71, 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101344
  14. Doli, A., Bamwesigye, D., Hlaváčková, P., Fialová, J., Kupec, P., Asamoah, O., 2021. Forest park visitors' opinions and willingness to pay for sustainable development of the Germia Forest and Recreational Park. Sustainability, 13(6), 3160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063160
  15. Forsius, M., Akujärvi, A., Mattsson, T., Holmberg, M., Punttila, P., Posch, M., Liski, J., Repo, A., Virkkala, R., Vihervaara, P., 2016. Modelling impacts of forest bioenergy use on ecosystem sustainability: Lammi LTER region, southern Finland. Ecological Indicators, 65, 66–75.
  16. Heckenhahn, J., Drupp, M.A., 2024. Relative price changes of ecosystem services: evidence from Germany. Environmental and Resource Economics, 87(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00838-7
  17. Holik, A., 2016. Relationship of economic growth with tourism sector. JEJAK: Journal of Economics and Policy, 9(1), 16–33.
  18. Hong, W., Ren, Z., Guo, Y., Wang, C., Cao, F., Zhang, P., Hong, S., Ma, Z., 2024. Spatiotemporal changes in urban forest carbon sequestration capacity and its potential drivers in an urban agglomeration: implications for urban CO2 emission mitigation under China’s rapid urbanization. Ecological Indicators, 159, 111601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111601
  19. Hutt-Taylor, K., Ziter, C.D., Frei, B., 2022. What evidence exists for the use of urban forest management in nature-based carbon solutions and bird conservation? A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00288-6
  20. Knippers, J., Schmid, U., Speck, T., 2019. Biomimetics for Architecture: Learning from Nature. Birkhäuser, Basel.
  21. Langner, A., Irauschek, F., Perez, S., Pardos, M., Zlatanov, T., Öhman, K., Nordström, E.-M., Lexer, M.J., 2017. Value-based ecosystem service trade-offs in multi-objective management in European mountain forests. Ecosystem Services, 26, 245–257.
  22. Lines, E.R., Fischer, F.J., Owen, H.J.F., Jucker, T., 2022. The shape of trees: reimagining forest ecology in three dimensions with remote sensing. Journal of Ecology, 110, 1730–1745.
  23. Nunes, M.H., Vaz, M.C., Campana, J.L., Vicentini, C.A., Laurance, S., Laurance, W.F., Andrade, A., Raumonen, P., Jackson, T., Zuquim, G., Wu, J., Peñuelas, J., Maeda, E.E., 2023. Edge effects on tree architecture exacerbate biomass loss of fragmented Amazonian forest. Nature Communications, 14, 812. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44004-5
  24. Menges, A., Reichert, S., 2015. Performative wood: physically programming the responsive architecture of the HygroScope and HygroSkin projects. Architectural Design, 85(5), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1956
  25. Moyib, F.R., Ojo, O.S., Ayodele, I.A., 2016. Willingness to pay for ecotourism in Oyan Lake, Nigeria. Almatourism - Journal of Tourism, Culture and Territorial Development, 7(13), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-5195/5987
  26. Myung, E., 2017. An exploratory study of attendee willingness to pay for environmentally friendly meetings. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration, 18, 272–287.
  27. Paranata, A., Sutanto, H., Dakwah, M., 2017. Willingness to pay of ecotourism visitors. JEJAK: Journal of Economics and Policy, 10(2), 350–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v10i2.11299
  28. Penn, J., Hu, W., Cox, L., Kozloff, L., 2016. Values for recreational beach quality in Oahu, Hawaii. Marine Resource Economics, 31, 47–62.
  29. Rahim, M., 2024. Psychological determinants of citizens' willingness to pay for ecosystem services in urban forests. Global Ecology and Conservation, 54, e03052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03052
  30. Ren, Y., Lu, L., Zhang, H., Chen, H., Zhu, D., 2020. Residents’ willingness to pay for ecosystem services and its influencing factors: a study of the Xin’an River Basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.122301
  31. Riedl, M., Jarský, V., Zahradník, D., Palátová, P., Dudík, R., Menhá zová, J., Šišák, L., 2020. Analysis of significant factors influencing the amount of collected forest berries in the Czech Republic. Forests, 11, 1114.
  32. Rößler, R., 2000. The late Palaeozoic tree fern Psaronius—an ecosystem unto itself. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 108(1–2), 55–74.
  33. Spindler, F., Werneburg, R., Schneider, J.W., Luthardt, L., Annacker, V., Rößler, R., 2018. First arboreal 'pelycosaurs' (Synapsida: Varanopidae) from the early Permian Chemnitz Fossil Lagerstätte, SE Germany. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 92(2), 315–364.
  34. Su, D., Cao, Y., Dong, X., Wu, Q., Fang, X., Cao, Y., 2024. Evaluation of ecosystem services budget based on ecosystem services flow: a case study of Hangzhou Bay area. Applied Geography, 162, 103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103150
  35. Tavárez, H., Abelleira, O., Elbakidze, L., 2024. Environmental awareness and willingness to pay for biodiversity improvement in Puerto Rico. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00869-y
  36. Thapa, S., Shrestha, S., Adhikari, R.K., 2022. Residents’ willingness-to-pay for watershed conservation program facilitating ecosystem services in Begnas Watershed, Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 7811–7832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01759-5
  37. Uchiyama, C., Ichikawa, K., Saito, O., 2024. Exploring landscape values and willingness to pay for perceived ecosystem services: the case of Malampaya Sound, a socio-ecological production landscape and seascape. Sustainability, 16(8), 3210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083210
  38. Venter, Z.S., Barton, D.N., Gundersen, V., Figari, H., Nowell, M.S., 2021. Back to nature: Norwegians sustain increased recreational use of urban green space months after the COVID-19 outbreak. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104175
  39. Verkerk, P.J., Mavsar, R., Giergiczny, M., Lindner, M., Edwards, D., Schelhaas, M.J., 2014. Assessing impacts of intensified biomass production and biodiversity protection on ecosystem services provided by European forests. Ecosystem Services, 9, 155–165.
  40. Weng, L., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Yang, J., Zheng, S., Liu, H., Wang, H., Zhu, L., 2023. The influence of visitors’ recreation experience and environmental attitude on environmentally responsible behavior: a case study of an urban forest park, China. Forests, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010024
  41. West, G.B., Enquist, B.J., Brown, J.H., 2009. A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 7040–7045.
  42. Xu, Y., Iida, Y., Huang, H., Shi, Z., Franklin, S.B., Luo, Y., Bao, D., Qiao, X., Lu, Z., Jiang, M., 2019. Linkages between tree architectural designs and life-history strategies in a subtropical montane moist forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 438, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.047