Vol. 116 No. 2 (2022)
Research Papers

Effects of Different Magnetically Treated Waters on Emergence and Growth of Snail Medic

Saeed Sharafi
Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Department of Water Science and Engineering Engineerinf, Arak University
Mohsen Nasrabadi
Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Department of Water Science and Engineering Engineerinf, Arak University
Mohammad Javad Nahvinia
Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Department of Water Science and Engineering Eng., Arak University

Published 2022-12-27


  • Emergence index,
  • Greenhouse,
  • Magnetic field,
  • Sand culture

How to Cite

Sharafi, S., Nasrabadi, M., & Nahvinia, M. J. . (2022). Effects of Different Magnetically Treated Waters on Emergence and Growth of Snail Medic. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 116(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.36253/jaeid-12531


The present study concerns the effects of different magnetically treated waters (distilled water (as control), domestic water, saline water (-3 MPa), waste water and purified water of Arak city) on emergence and growth of Medicago scutellata (Var. Rabinson) seedlings under greenhouse conditions. The various waters were treated by passing it through 250 mT magnetic fields at flow rate of 2 lit/min. One hundred seeds per treatment were soaked in magnetically-treated waters for 12 hours and cultivated in pots with sand bed. The number of seedlings emerged was counted on daily basis, whereas growth data was measured on the 20th day after planting. Seedlings from exposed seeds to magnetically treated waters showed an improvement of 5-10 percent in the emergence and a 5-14 and 2-16 percent increase in root length and weight, respectively. Dry weight of emerged seedlings in pots by magnetically-treated waters, in comparison with those in untreated pots (control) increased for distilled water (14.4%), domestic water (16.3%), saline water (9.18%), and purified water (2.92%). The results of seedling lengths in the pots of magnetically-treated waters showed that, 5.54, 14.82, 14.67, 13.75, and 14.04 percent increased, respectively. From a practical point of view, it was concluded that could be a promising technique for agricultural improvements.


  1. Aladjadjiyan, A. (2002). Study of the influence of magnetic field on some biological characteristics of Zea mais. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 3(2), 89-94.
  2. Asadi-Samani, M., Pourakbar, L., & Azimi, N. (2013). Magnetic field effects on seed germination and activities of some enzymes in cumin. Life Science Journal-Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition, 10(1), 323-328.‏
  3. Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) (1983). Seed Vigor Testing Handbook. 1st Edition, AOSA, East Lasing, 88. ‏
  4. Bilalis, D. J., Katsenios, N., Efthimiadou, A., Karkanis, A., Khah, E. M., & Mitsis, T. (2013). Magnetic field pre-sowing treatment as an organic friendly technique to promote plant growth and chemical elements accumulation in early stages of cotton. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7(1), 46-50.‏
  5. Carbonell, M. V., Florez, M., Martínez, E., Maqueda, R., & Amaya, J. M. (2011). Study of stationary magnetic fields on initial growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds. Seed Science and Technology, 39(3), 673-679.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2011.39.3.15
  6. De Souza, A., García, D., Sueiro, L., Licea, L., & Porras, E. (2005). Pre-sowing magnetic treatment of tomato seeds: effects on the growth and yield of plants cultivated late in the season. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(1), 113-122.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2005031-131
  7. El-Zawily, A. E. S., Meleha, M., El-Sawy, M., El-Attar, E. H., Bayoumi, Y., & Alshaal, T. (2019). Application of magnetic field improves growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato irrigated alternatively by fresh and agricultural drainage water. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 181, 248-254.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.018
  8. Florez, M., Carbonell, M. V., & Martínez, E. (2007). Exposure of maize seeds to stationary magnetic fields: Effects on germination and early growth. Environmental and experimental botany, 59(1), 68-75.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.10.006
  9. Gholami, A., Sharafi, S., & Abbasdokht, H. (2010). Effect of magnetic field on seed germination of two wheat cultivars. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 62, 279-282.
  10. ‏Grewal, H. S., & Maheshwari, B. L. (2011). Magnetic treatment of irrigation water and snow pea and chickpea seeds enhances early growth and nutrient contents of seedlings. Bioelectromagnetics, 32(1), 58-65.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20615
  11. Hachicha, M., Kahlaoui, B., Khamassi, N., Misle, E., & Jouzdan, O. (2018). Effect of electromagnetic treatment of saline water on soil and crops. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17(2), 154-162.‏
  12. Hachicha, M., Kahlaoui, B., Khamassi, N., Misle, E., & Jouzdan, O. (2018). Effect of electromagnetic treatment of saline water on soil and crops. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17(2), 154-162.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.03.003
  13. Hasaani, A. S., Hadi, Z. L., & Rasheed, K. A. (2015). Experimental study of the interaction of magnetic fields with flowing water. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3(3), 1-8.‏
  14. Hozayn, M., & Qados, A. A. (2010). Magnetic water application for improving wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop production. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1(4), 677-682.‏
  15. Izmailov, A., Smirnov, I., Khort, D., Filippov, R., & Kutyrev, A. (2018). Magnetic-pulse processing of seeds of berry crops. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 64(4), 181-186.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/9/2018-RAE
  16. Johan, S., Fadil, O., & Zularisham, A. (2004). Effect of magnetic fields on suspended particles in sewage. Malaysian Journal of Science, 23, 141-148.‏
  17. Kotab, A. (2013). Magnetized water and memory meter. Energy and Power Engineering, 5(1): 422-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2013.56045
  18. Martínez, E., Flórez, M., Maqueda, R., Carbonell, M. V., & Amaya, J. M. (2009). Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris L.) growth stimulation due to exposure to 125 and 250 mT stationary fields. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 18(4).‏
  19. Podlesny, J., Lenartowicz, W., & Sowinski, M. (2003). The effect of pre-sowing treatment of seeds magnetic biostimulation on morphological feature formation and white lupin yielding. Zeszyty Problemowe Postepow Nauk Rolniczych, (495), 399-406.‏
  20. Podlesny, J., Pietruszewski, S., & Podlesna, A. (2004). Efficiency of the magnetic treatment of broad bean seeds cultivated under experimental plot conditions. International Agrophysics, 18(1), 65-71.
  21. Racuciu, M., & Creangia, D. E. (2005). Biological effects of low frequency electromagnetic field in Curcubita pepo. In Proceedings of the Third Moscow International Symposium on Magnetism (pp. 278-282).‏
  22. Rameen, S.A. and Younes, M.I.B. (2011). Testing commercial water magnetizers. A study of TDS and pH 15th International Water Technology Conference, IWTC -15 2011, Alexandria, Egypt.
  23. Rodriguez, R. N. (2011). Sas. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 3(1), 1-11.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.131
  24. Shahin, M. M., Mashhour, A. M. A., & Abd-Elhady, E. S. E. (2016). Effect of magnetized irrigation water and seeds on some water properties, growth parameter and yield productivity of cucumber plants. Current Science International, 5(2), 152-164.‏
  25. Sharafi, S. and Mohammadi Ghaleni, M. (2021). Calibration of empirical equations for estimating reference evapotranspiration in different climates of Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 145, 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03654-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03654-5
  26. Sharafi, S. (2020). Effective methods for improving seed germination of Medicago scutellata affected by salinity and drought stresses. Iranian Journal of Seed Research, 7(1), 45-63.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/yujs.7.1.121
  27. Sharafi, S., Ahmadi, M.R. Ghonji, M. and Nassiri, E. (2019). Effect of stratification on seed germination of annual Medic affected by salinity and drought stresses. 6th Iranian Scientific Congress on Development and Promotion of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Tehran, Iran.
  28. Sharafi, S., Ghasemi, S. and Gholipoor, M. (2006). The effectiveness of yield and some attributes of Medicago scutellata Var Rabinson from sowing date, sowing depth and seeding rate. 9th congeries Agriculture and Plant breeding of Iran.
  29. Sharififar, A., Nazari, M., & Asghari, H. R. (2015). Effect of ultrasonic waves on seed germination of Atriplex lentiformis, Cuminum cyminum, and Zygophyllum eurypterum. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 2(3), 102-104.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2015.05.003
  30. Shine, M. B., & Guruprasad, K. N. (2012). Impact of pre-sowing magnetic field exposure of seeds to stationary magnetic field on growth, reactive oxygen species and photosynthesis of maize under field conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 34(1), 255-265.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0824-7
  31. Shine, M. B., Guruprasad, K. N., & Anand, A. (2011). Enhancement of germination, growth, and photosynthesis in soybean by pre‐treatment of seeds with magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics, 32(6), 474-484.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20656
  32. Smirnov, I. V. (2004). The effect of a specially modified electromagnetic field on the molecular structure of liquid water. EXPLORE-MOUNT VERNON-, 13, 22-32.‏
  33. Vashisth, A., & Nagarajan, S. (2010). Effect on germination and early growth characteristics in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds exposed to static magnetic field. Journal of plant physiology, 167(2), 149-156.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.08.011
  34. Xu, Y., Xue, W., Li, Y., Guo, L., & Shang, W. (2017). Electromagnetic field analysis of an electric dipole antenna based on a surface integral equation in multilayered dissipative media. Applied Sciences, 7(8), 774.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080774