The determinants of technical efficiency in beekeeping farms and the role of agricultural subsidies: the case of Nigde, Turkey

  • Betül Gürer Department of Animal Sciences and Technologies. Nigde Ömer Halisdemir University. Turkey
  • Ethem Akyol Department of Animal Sciences and Technologies. Nigde Ömer Halisdemir University. Turkey

Abstract

This paper examines the association between agricultural subsidies and farm efficiency using stochastic frontier analysis on beekeeping farming. Turkey has huge honey production potential. However, traditional production mode negatively affects the total production and productivity. In this study, it was used primary data from 54 producers in Nigde province in 2017. Producers were selected through stratified sampling method. According to results, the mean technical efficiency of the beekeeping farms is 0.43. The beekeepers were found to be generally fairly inefficient. The most important factors, which determine technical inefficiency, are agricultural subsidies, major occupation for beekeeping, full frame numbers with honey per hive, pure race of bee, type of beekeeping farming and hive numbers. The result reveals that the government subsidy scheme had a net negative impact on the technical efficiency of beekeeping farm. This is the ?rst time that such an impact assessment of government subsidies on technical efficiency in the beekeeping farming has been carried out in Turkey. For this reason, it is expected that the results will be useful both for scientists and policy decision makers in agriculture and rural development.

References

Aigner D.J. and Chu S.F., 1968. On estimating the industry production function, American Economic Review, Vol 58. 226-239.

Bakucs L.Z., Latruffe L., Ferto I. and Fogarasi J., 2010.The impact of EU accession on farms’ technical efficiency in Hungary. Post-Communist Economies, 22(2):165-175.

Battese G.E., 1992. Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: A survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics. Agricultural Economics, (7):185–208.

Battese G.E. and Coelli T.J., 1995.A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Emprical Economomics, 20(2):325-332. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442]

Bergström F., 2000. Capital subsidies and the performance of firms. Small Business Economics, 14(3):183-193.

Bravo-Ureta B.E., Solís D., Moreira V.H., Maripani J.F., Thiam A. and Rivas T.E., 2007. Technical efficiency in farming: a meta-regression analysis, Journal of Produvtivity Analysis, 27(1): 57–72.

Brümmer B. and Loy J.P., 2000. The technical efficiency impact of farm credit programmes: A case study of northern Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(3):405-418.

Coelli T.J., 1996. A guide to DEAP Version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA Working Paper 96/08. Department of Econometrics. University of New England. Armidale. Australia.

Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P., O'Donnell J.C. and Battese G.E., 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. 2nd ed. Springer. New York.

Dung K.T., Sumalde Z.M., Pede V.O., McKinley J.D., Garcia Y.T. and Bello A.L., 2011. Technical efficiency of resource-conserving technologies in rice-wheat systems: the case of Behar and Eastern Uttar Pradesh in India. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 24: 201–210.

FAO, 2017. FAOSTAT. [http://faostat.fao.org/]

Gaga V.A. and Esaulov V.N., 2016. Innovative technologies and modern facilities in beekeeping. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. 142. No.1, p.012022. IOP Publishing.

Guyomard H., Baudry M.M. and Carpentier A., 1996. Estimating crop supply response in the presence of farm programmes: application to the CAP. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 23(4): 401–20.

Hadley D., 2006. Patterns in technical efficiency and technical change at the farm-level in England and Wales, 1982–2002. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(1):81–100.

Harris R. and Trainor M., 2005. Capital subsidies and their impact on total factor productivity: firm-level evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Regional Sciences, 45(1):49-74.

Hennessy D.A., 1998. The production effects of agricultural income support policies under uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1):46-57.

Iraizoz B., Bardaji I. and Rapun M., 2005. The Spanish beef sector in the 1990s: impact of the BSE crisis on efficiency and profitability. Applied Economics, 37: 473–484.

Kumbhakar S.C., 1987. The specification of technical and allocative inefficiency of multi-product firms in stochastic production and profit frontiers. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 3(2): 213–23.

Kumbhakar S.C. and Lien G., 2010. In Impact of subsidies on farm productivity and efficiency, in impact of public support to agriculture. ed. V.E. Ball, R.Fanfani and L. Gutierrez. 109–124. New York: Springe.

Lachaal L., 1994. Subsidies, endogenous technical efficiency and the measurement of productivity growth. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26(1):299-310.

Latruffe L., 2010. Competitiveness, productivity and efficiency in the agricultural and the agrifood sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working paper: OECD Publishing.

Latruffe L. and Desjeux Y., 2016. Common agricultural policy support, technical efficiency, and productivity change in French agriculture. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 97(1): 15–28.

Latruffe L., Bravo-Ureta B.E., Carpentier A., Desjeux Y. and Moreira V.H., 2016. Subsidies and technical efficiency in agriculture: evidence from European dairy farms, Amer J of Agri Econ., 99(3): 783–799. [doi: 10.1093/ajae/aaw077].

Manevska-Tasevska G., Rabinowicz E. and Surry Y., 2013. Policy impact on farm efficiency in Sweden: 1998-2008. Agrifood Economics Center. Working paper,No.6. Scheelevägen, Sweden.

McCloud N. and Kumbhakar S.C., 2008. Do subsidies drive productivity? A crosscountry analysis of Nordic dairy farms. In Bayesian Econometrics, Advances in Econometrics, edited by Chib, S., W. Griffiths, G. Koop, and D. Terrel, 245–274. Bingley, UK: Howard House, Wagon Lane.

Minviel J.J. and Latruffe L., 2016. Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results. Applied Economics, 49(2): 213-226. [doi: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1194963]

Rezitis A.N., Tsiboukas K. and Tsoukalas S., 2003. Investigation of factors influencing the technical efficiency of agricultural producers participating in farm credit programs: The case of Greece. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 35(3): 529-541.

Rizov M., Pokrivcak J. and Ciaian P., 2012. CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms. International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference. Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.

Sckokai P. and Moro D., 2009. Modelling the impact of the cap single farm payment on farm investment and output. European Rev of Agricultural Economics, 36(3):395–423.

Sharma R. and Bhatia R., 2001. Economics of stationary and migratory beekeeping in Himachal Pradesh. Agricultural Sciences Digest, 21(3): 196-197.

Yu C., 1998. The effects of exogenous variables in efficiency measurement- A Monte Carlo study, European Journal of Operational Research, 105: 569-580.

Zhengfei G. and Lansink A.O., 2006. The source of productivity growth in Dutch agriculture: a perspective from finance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88: 644-656.

Zhu X. and Lansink A.O., 2010. Impact of CAP subsidies on technical efficiency of crop farms in Germany. the Netherlands and Sweden, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61:545-564.

Published
12-12-2018
How to Cite
Gürer, B., & Akyol, E. (2018). The determinants of technical efficiency in beekeeping farms and the role of agricultural subsidies: the case of Nigde, Turkey. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 112(2), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.20182.790
Section
Research Papers