Life cycle assessment of the valorization of rice straw for energy purposes. Rice production in Cuba

  • Edelvy Bravo Amarante Center for Studies on Energy and Industrial Processes (CEEPI), University of Sancti Spíritus "José Martí Pérez". Cuba
  • Ralf Kiran Schulz Institute of Professional Training (IBB). University of Kassel. Germany
  • Osvaldo Romero Romero Center for Studies on Energy and Industrial Processes (CEEPI). University of Sancti Spiritus "José Martí Pérez". Cuba
  • Zuleiqui Gil Unday Center for Studies on Energy and Industrial Processes (CEEPI). University of Sancti Spiritus "José Martí Pérez". Cuba
  • Eduardo López Bastida Center for the Study of Energy and Environment, University of Cienfuegos. Cuba
  • Leonor Patricia Güereca Hernández Engineering Institute, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Mexico

Abstract

Due to the need to evaluate the sustainability of the management of rice straw during rice production in Cuba, the objective of this work was to propose the analysis of four possible alternatives, for the valorization of rice straw for energy purposes in Cuba in two different scenarios, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) metodology was used. The "South of the Jíbaro" Grain Enterprise was evaluated as a case study. The environmental impacts generated from the intermediate impact categories and those associated with the three categories of final damages proposed by the methodology ReCiPe was evaluated. In addition, the behavior of the ecological footprint was evaluated. The climate change impact category expressed in kg CO2-Eq. The three alternatives 2, 3 and 4, where valorization of rice straw for energy purposes are considered, presented the better results. The alternative 4, where part of the biogas generated is used in the transportation of the different products has the least impact on climate change, with a difference from the currently used alternative 1, of 4.09923 e + 7 kg of CO2-Eq. In the particle formation impact category expressed in (kg PM10-Eq), alternatives 2 and 3 have the most unfavorable results with emissions of 3.46561 e + 5 kg PM10-Eq. This value is higher than the alternative 1 (the currently used), which is associated with the necessary increase of diesel consumption for the transfer of the different products in the process. However, in Alternative 4, the emissions are reduced in 1.86204e + 5 kg PM10-Eq when the biogas is used as a fuel source for the replacement of a part of the diesel used in transportation. In the categories of final damages, the three alternatives where it is proposed to valorize rice straw for energy purposes have advantages with respect to Alternative 1. Alternatives 2 and 3 have a score of 9.11450e + 5 less than Alternative 1; and Alternative 4 reaches a score of 3.033540e + 6 less than Alternative 1 and of 2.119390e + 6 points with respect to Alternatives 2 and 3, what makes Alternative 4 the one that damages the environment.

Author Biography

Eduardo López Bastida, Center for the Study of Energy and Environment, University of Cienfuegos. Cuba

 

 

References

Abril, D., Navarro, E., & Abril, A. (2009). La Paja De Arroz. Consecuencias De Su Manejo Y Alternativas De Aprovechamiento. Agron, 17(2), 69–79.

Buitrago, R., & Belalcázar, L. C. (2013). Análisis del ciclo de vida para la producción de bioetanol en Colombia por medio de OpenLCA. Épsilon, (21), 145–156. Retrieved from http://revistas.lasalle.edu.co/index.php/ep/article/viewFile/2456/2371

Cacua, K., Amell, A., & Olmos, L. (2011). Estudio comparativo entre las pro- piedades de combustión de la mezcla biogás- biogás - aire normal y geno A comparative study of the com- bustion properties of normal bio- gas - air mixture and oxygen- oxygen - enriched biogas- biogas - air, 31(1), 233–241.

Canakci, M., & Hosoz, M. (2006). Energy and exergy analyses of a diesel engine fuelled with various biodiesels. Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy, 1(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240500400796

Ciroth, A. (2007). ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA — A new open source software for life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12(4), 209–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-007-0337-1

Congress, W. B. (2017). World Bioenergy Congress and Expo, 6(3), 4541.

Contreras, L. M., Schelle, H., Sebrango, C. R., & Pereda, I. (2012). Methane potential and biodegradability of rice straw, rice husk and rice residues from the drying process. Water Science and Technology, 65(6), 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.951

Contreras, L. M., Romero, O. R., Martínez-Castro, Y., Reyes, I. P., & Finco, A. (2014). Energetic, environmental and economic potentialities of the anaerobic treatment of rice straw for the case of the Cuban enterprise “Sur del Jíbaro”. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 37(5/6), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2014.067670

Fuzzi, S., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K., Decesari, S., Denier Van Der Gon, H., Facchini, M. C., … Gilardoni, S. (2015). Particulate matter, air quality and climate: Lessons learned and future needs. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(14), 8217–8299. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8217-2015

Gadde, B., Bonnet, S., Menke, C., & Garivait, S. (2009). Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environmental Pollution, 157(5), 1554–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.01.004

Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., Schryver, A. De, Struijs, J., & Zelm, R. Van. (2009). ReCiPe 2008. Potentials, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.029/2003JD004283

Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018

Huntzinger, D. N., & Eatmon, T. D. (2009). A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing : comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(7), 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007

Karagulian, F., Belis, C. A., Dora, C. F. C., Pr??ss-Ust??n, A.

M., Bonjour, S., Adair-Rohani, H., & Amann, M. (2015). Contributions to cities’ ambient particulate matter (PM): A systematic review of local source contributions at global level. Atmospheric Environment, 120, 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087

Lagomarsino, A., Agnelli, A. E., Pastorelli, R., Pallara, G., Rasse, D. P., & Silvennoinen, H. (2016). Management of rice paddy fields affects greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 93, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015

Laurent, A., Bakas, I., Clavreul, J., Bernstad, A., Niero, M., Gentil, E., … Christensen, T. H. (2014). Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems - Part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Management, 34(3), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045

López-Dávila, E., Jiménez, J., Cisneros-Ortiz, M. E., & Romero-Romero, O. (2013). Potencial de Biogás de la Fermentación Anaerobia de Residuos Sólidos de la Agroindustria Azucarera, utilizando Lodo Anaerobio de Estiércol Porcino. Potential of Biogas of the Anaerobic Fermentation of Solid Residues of the Sugar Agro-Industry, Using Anaerobic Pig Dung Mud., 40(1), 1–7. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=fua&AN=108893937&lang=es&site=ehost-live

Mussoline, W., Esposito, G., Giordano, A., & Lens, P. (2013). The anaerobic digestion of rice straw: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 43(9), 895–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.627018

Ram, A., Carbonell, B., & Avalo, Y. (n.d.). EVALUACIÓN AGRONÓMICA Y MEDIOAMBIENTAL, (2), 137–145.

Roy, P., Tokuyasu, K., Orikasa, T., Nakamura, N., & Shiina, T. (2012). A techno-economic and environmental evaluation of the life cycle of bioethanol produced from rice straw by RT-CaCCO process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.013

Sanchis Jiménez, Elena López Jiménez, Petra Amparo Calvet Sanz, S. (2014). Emisiones De Gases En El Cultivo Del Arroz: Efecto De La Gestión De La Paja, 76.

Shafie, S. M., Masjuki, H. H., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2014). Life cycle assessment of rice straw-based power generation in Malaysia. Energy, 70, 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.014

Standard, I. (2006). INTERNATIONAL STANDARD assessment — Requirements and, 2006.

Wang, G., Gavala, H. N., Skiadas, I. V., & Ahring, B. K. (2009). Wet explosion of wheat straw and codigestion with swine manure: Effect on the methane productivity. Waste Management, 29(11), 2830–2835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.07.004

Zhao, R., Zhang, Z., Zhang, R., Li, M., Lei, Z., Utsumi, M., & Sugiura, N. (2010). Methane production from rice straw pretreated by a mixture of acetic-propionic acid. Bioresource Technology, 101(3), 990–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.020

Published
12-12-2018
How to Cite
Bravo Amarante, E., Kiran Schulz, R., Romero Romero, O., Gil Unday, Z., López Bastida, E., & Güereca Hernández, L. P. (2018). Life cycle assessment of the valorization of rice straw for energy purposes. Rice production in Cuba. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 112(2), 297-320. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.20182.741
Section
Research Papers