Evaluation of post-mining land for rubber and oil palm plantations in Kutai Kartanegara, Indonesia

  • Ratna Shanti Study Program of Agroecotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Mulawarman University.
  • Ratna Nirmala Study Program of Agroecotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Mulawarman University.

Abstract

This study was aimed to understand the limiting factors of rubber plant and oil palm growth and to find out the appropriate technology, soil, and land management for rubber and oil palm plantations. This study was conducted in the area of post-mining land KP. PT. Mahakam Sumber Jaya in Kutai Kartanegara, with area of 121 hectares, starting from November 2015 until April 2016. The primary data was collected by soil and land surveys which consist of physical characteristics and vegetation biodiversity. Some other physical and chemical characteristics data were taken from laboratory of soil analysis. In this study, land classification of rubber and oil palm plantations were evaluated using parametric methods by rating the climate components, soil, and land characteristics. According to the analysis of climate components, climate suitability for rubber and oil palm plantations belong to S1 class (very suitable). Moreover, based on soil analysis data and land characteristics, land evaluation for rubber plantation was classified into S3 class (marginally suitable, covers area of 25 hectares with limiting factors slope and soil fertility) and N1 class (currently not suitable, covers area of 96 hectares with limiting factors soil depth, soil fertility, texture, and drainage). While for oil palm plantation, land evaluation was classified into S3 class (marginally suitable, covers area of 75 hectares with limiting factors soil depth, texture, and fertility) and N1 class (currently not suitable, covers area of 46 hectares with limiting factors slope, soil depth, fertility, texture, and drainage).

References

Angel P.N., Barton C.D., Warner R.C., Agouridis C., Taylor T., and Hall S.L., 2008. Forest establishment and water quality characteristics as influenced by spoil type on a loose-graded surface mine. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, pp 28–65.

Beek K.J., 1974. Land evaluation for agricultural development. Publication No. 23. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRI. Wageningen, The Netherlands. p 355.

Dallaire K., Skousen J., and Schuler J., 2015. Height of hardwood species growing on mine sites reclaimed using the forestry reclamation approach compared to natural conditions. JASMR, 4(2): 20–35.

Dent D. and Young A., 1981. Soil survey and land evaluation. George Allen and Unwin, London.

Devictor V., Julliard R., and Jiguet F., 2008. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos, 117(4): 507-514.

Djaenudin D., Basuni, Hardjowigeno S., Subagyo H., and Sukardi M., 1994. Kesesuaian lahan untuk tanaman pertanian dan tanaman kehutanan. Centre for Soil and Agroclimate Research, Bogor.

Estate Service of Kalimantan Timur Province, 2016. Kalimantan Timur in figures. BPS-Statistics of Kalimantan Timur Province, Samarinda.

Jardjowigeno, S. and Widiatmaka, 2001. Kesesuaian lahan dan perencanaan tataguna lahan. Jurusan Tanah, Fakultas Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Jatam (Jaringan Advokasi Tambang), 2015. Luas lahan tambang batubara. Kalimantan Timur. Samarinda.

Kartasaputra, 1987. Teknologi konservasi tanah dan air. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Kustiawan W., 2001. Perkembangan vegetasi dan kondisi tanah serta revegetasi pada lahan bekas galian tambang batubara di Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Rimba Kalimantan, Desember 2001, 6(2): 20–31.

Legwaila I.A., Lange E., and Cripps J., 2015. Quarry reclamation in England: A review of techniques. JASMR, 4(2): 55–79.

Mactarlane H.L., et al., 2006. Rehabilitasi tambang. Praktek Kerja Usulan dalam Program Pengembangan yang Berkelanjutan di Industri Pertambangan, Departement of Industry, Tourism, and Resources. Australian Government, p 78.

Mummey D.L., Stahl P.D., and Buyer J.S., 2002. Microbial biomarkers as an indicator of ecosystem recovery surface mine reclamation. Applied Soil Ecology, 21(3): 251-259.

Sindu A. 1999. Pemanfaatan limbah kelapa sawit sebagai pakan ternak. Jurnal Sains danTeknologi Indonesia, 1(3): 82–86.

Sitorus S.R.P., Kusumastuti E., Badri L.N., 2008. Karakteristik dan teknik rehabilitas lahan pasca penambangan timah di Pulau Bangka dan Singkep. Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim, 27: 57–73.

Suhendry I., Ginting S., Azwar R., and Nasution, M.Z. 1996. Potensi pengembangan tanaman karet pada tanah marginal beriklim kering. Studi kasus daerah Langga Payung Sumatera Utara, Warta Puslit Karet, 15 (2): 67–77.

Susanto R., 2005. Dasar–dasar ilmu tanah. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Sys C., Rants E.V., and Debaveye J., 1991. Land evaluation Part I, II and III. Method in land evaluation. General Administration for Development Co-operation, Brussel- Belgium.

Published
28-06-2018
How to Cite
Shanti, R., & Nirmala, R. (2018). Evaluation of post-mining land for rubber and oil palm plantations in Kutai Kartanegara, Indonesia. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 112(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.20181.689
Section
Research Papers